mridulm commented on PR #43238: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43238#issuecomment-1760357448
I was trying to see if `spark.network.ssl` made more sense, and why we have `spark.ssl` and not `spark.ui.ssl` (given current use is for UI). We used to have more ssl related configs in the past under that namespace - `spark.ssl.akka`, `spark.ssl.fs` (file server), etc ... with the intent to keep `spark.ssl` as the namespace for various module's ssl config. Given this, even though today it is just UI, it does make more sense to go back to that approach. Let us keep it as proposed in this PR. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
