LuciferYang opened a new pull request, #43379:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/43379

   This reverts commit d1bd21a2a219ebe6c5ac3fcb1e17db75af3c670c.
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   This pr aims to revert SPARK-45502 to make the test case 
`KafkaSourceStressSuite` stable.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   The test case `KafkaSourceStressSuite` has become very unstable after the 
merger of SPARK-45502, with 10 out of the recent 22 tests failing because of 
it. Revert it for now, and we can upgrade Kafka again after resolving the test 
issues.
   
   - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6497999347/job/17648385705
   - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6502219014/job/17660900989
   - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6502591917/job/17661861797
   - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6503144598/job/17663199041
   - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6503233514/job/17663413817
   - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6504416528/job/17666334238
   - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6509796846/job/17682130466
   - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6510877112/job/17685502094
   - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6512948316/job/17691625228
   - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6516366232/job/17699813649
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   No
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   Pass GitHub Actions
   
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   No


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to