dongjoon-hyun commented on code in PR #47743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/47743#discussion_r1715670189


##########
sql/core/benchmarks/FilterPushdownBenchmark-jdk21-results.txt:
##########
@@ -2,733 +2,733 @@
 Pushdown for many distinct value case
 
================================================================================================
 
-OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 21.0.3+9-LTS on Linux 6.5.0-1018-azure
+OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 21.0.4+7-LTS on Linux 6.5.0-1025-azure
 AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
 Select 0 string row (value IS NULL):      Best Time(ms)   Avg Time(ms)   
Stdev(ms)    Rate(M/s)   Per Row(ns)   Relative
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Parquet Vectorized                                 6309           6370         
 57          2.5         401.1       1.0X
-Parquet Vectorized (Pushdown)                       294            324         
 23         53.4          18.7      21.4X
-Native ORC Vectorized                              5129           5216         
 60          3.1         326.1       1.2X
-Native ORC Vectorized (Pushdown)                    323            330         
  6         48.7          20.5      19.5X
+Parquet Vectorized                                 6345           6437         
 61          2.5         403.4       1.0X
+Parquet Vectorized (Pushdown)                       341            363         
 12         46.2          21.7      18.6X

Review Comment:
   `Parquet Vectorized (Pushdown)` becomes slower consistently in this 
benchmark for both Java 17/21.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to