sahnib opened a new pull request, #47875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/47875

   
   
   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the 
guideline first in
        'common/utils/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   Currently, we have a scenario where if a version X is loaded (and there is 
an existing snapshot with version X), Spark will reuse the SST files from the 
existing Snapshot resulting in a VersionID Mismatch error. This PR fixes this 
issue, and simplifies RocksDB state management. The change eliminates the 
majority of shared state between Task thread and Maintenance thread, 
simplifying the implementation.
   
   With this change, the task thread is now solely responsible for keeping 
track of the local files to DFS file mapping, the maintenance thread will not 
access this mapping. The DFS file names are generated at `commit()` - the 
generated snapshot, and the mapping containing the new SST files (with their 
generated DFS names) is handed over to the maintenance thread. The latest 
generated snapshot will be appended to a ConcurrentLinkedQueue (named 
snapshotsToUploadQueue). 
   
   The maintenance thread polls from the snapshotsToUploadQueue repeatedly 
until its empty. For the last snapshot polled out of the queue, the maintenance 
thread will upload the new SST files. The maintenance thread will also clear 
all removed snapshot objects from the disk.
   
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   These changes fix an issue where Spark Streaming fails with RocksDB 
VersionIdMismatch error if there is a existing snapshot (not yet uploaded) for 
RocksDB version being loaded. In this scenario, SST files from existing 
snapshot are reused resulting in a versionId Mismatch error. In short, these 
changes: 
   
   1. Remove shared fileMapping between RocksDB Maintenance thread and task 
thread, simplifying the file mapping logic. The file Mapping is only modified 
from task thread after this change.
   2. Fixes the issue where RocksDB SST files from current snapshot (with same 
version) are reused, resulting in RocksDB VersionId Mismatch.
   3. Swap acquireLock with a Reentrant logic for easier management of acquire 
Lock.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   No
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   If benchmark tests were added, please run the benchmarks in GitHub Actions 
for the consistent environment, and the instructions could accord to: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html#github-workflow-benchmarks.
   -->
   1. All existing testcases pass. 
   2. Added new testcases suggested in 
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/47850/files, and ensure they pass with 
these changes. 
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this 
patch, please include the
   phrase: 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version.
   If no, write 'No'.
   Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling 
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details.
   -->
   No


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to