peter-toth opened a new pull request, #48429:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/48429

   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   This is a follow-up PR that reverts 
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/48284 in the first commit and offers a new 
way to deal with the issue of conflicting CTE ids. This PR generates new CTE 
ids for conflicting ones and retains the pre  
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/48284 reference counting logic. See the 
the details in 
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/48284#issuecomment-2391887954.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   The previous PR relied on the fact that nested, connected CTEs get flattened 
during resolution (see an example why it worked in a some cases: 
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/48284#issuecomment-2386982325), and so the 
remaining `WithCTE` nodes in the plan are surely self-contained. If we can't 
rely on that fact then we need a more robust solution.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   No, because currently some issues 
(https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/48284#issuecomment-2389011706) can come 
up with manually assembed plans only. (I think we should not consider an issue 
user-facing if it can't be reproduced with public APIs.)
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   Existing and new UTs.
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   No.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to