Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5400#discussion_r31545767
  
    --- Diff: 
network/common/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/buffer/LargeByteBufferHelperSuite.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.spark.network.buffer;
    +
    +import java.io.*;
    +import java.nio.channels.FileChannel;
    +
    +import org.junit.Test;
    +
    +import static org.junit.Assert.*;
    +
    +public class LargeByteBufferHelperSuite {
    +
    +  @Test
    +  public void testMapFile() throws IOException {
    +    File testFile = File.createTempFile("large-byte-buffer-test", ".bin");
    +    try {
    +      testFile.deleteOnExit();
    +      OutputStream out = new FileOutputStream(testFile);
    +      byte[] buffer = new byte[1 << 16];
    +      long len = ((long)buffer.length) + Integer.MAX_VALUE + 1;
    +      for (int i = 0; i < buffer.length; i++) {
    +        buffer[i] = (byte) i;
    +      }
    +      for (int i = 0; i < len / buffer.length; i++) {
    +        out.write(buffer);
    --- End diff --
    
    I'm a little concerned that writing the same data over and over might mask 
some nasty issues like the one I think I found earlier. Perhaps this should be 
writing random data instead? (That would probably be prohibitively slow with 
such a large test file, though.)
    
    You could have two `java.util.Random` instances with the same seed to be 
able to recreate the input data while checking.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to