LuciferYang commented on code in PR #49107:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/49107#discussion_r1945123620
##########
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnClusterSuite.scala:
##########
@@ -237,6 +265,16 @@ class YarnClusterSuite extends BaseYarnClusterSuite {
testPySpark(false)
}
+ test("run Python application with Spark Connect in yarn-client mode") {
Review Comment:
These two new test cases should assume
`sql.IntegratedUDFTestUtils.shouldTestPandasUDFs`, otherwise they may lead to
test failures, such as:
https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/13179439122/job/36786327176.
However, the `yarn` module currently does not have a dependency on the `sql`
test module. Should we add this dependency to the `yarn` module, or is there
other better alternative solution?
##########
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnClusterSuite.scala:
##########
@@ -237,6 +265,16 @@ class YarnClusterSuite extends BaseYarnClusterSuite {
testPySpark(false)
}
+ test("run Python application with Spark Connect in yarn-client mode") {
Review Comment:
@HyukjinKwon These two new test cases should assume
`sql.IntegratedUDFTestUtils.shouldTestPandasUDFs`, otherwise they may lead to
test failures, such as:
https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/13179439122/job/36786327176.
However, the `yarn` module currently does not have a dependency on the `sql`
test module. Should we add this dependency to the `yarn` module, or is there
other better alternative solution?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
