HeartSaVioR commented on PR #49983: URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/49983#issuecomment-2676535275
I'm really not sure 2 is a real alternative. We shouldn't assume users to be very close to hear Spark community news. My experience so far is telling me that users even don't read the doc. Another point for me is that users do not really care about whether the config contains the vendor name or not. This is really a concern from ASF hat on (for sure, I agree this is problematic with one of PMC members in ASF project hat on), but I'm sure it's not a huge concern from users. So if we tell users to upgrade the Spark version just because of this problematic config, I'm very sure that they won't upgrade. We shouldn't pretend that it will be successful if we enforce users to upgrade to specific version. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
