Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/597#discussion_r12388904
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/MovieLensALS.scala ---
@@ -88,7 +92,27 @@ object MovieLensALS {
val ratings = sc.textFile(params.input).map { line =>
val fields = line.split("::")
- Rating(fields(0).toInt, fields(1).toInt, fields(2).toDouble)
+ if (params.implicitPrefs) {
+ /**
+ * MovieLens ratings are on a scale of 1-5:
+ * 5: Must see
+ * 4: Will enjoy
+ * 3: It's okay
+ * 2: Fairly bad
+ * 1: Awful
+ * So we should not recommend a movie if the predicted rating is
less than 3.
+ * To map ratings to confidence scores, we use
+ * 5 -> 2.5, 4 -> 1.5, 3 -> 0.5, 2 -> -0.5, 1 -> -1.5. This
mappings means unobserved
+ * entries are generally between It's okay and Fairly bad.
+ * The semantics of 0 in this expanded world of non-positive
weights
+ * are "the same as never having interacted at all"
+ * It's possible that 0 values are ignored when constructing the
sparse representation,
--- End diff --
I think it's just ok won't cause a problem. should i leave it as it is ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
