peter-toth commented on code in PR #52149:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/52149#discussion_r2321586724


##########
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/CollapseProjectSuite.scala:
##########
@@ -298,4 +298,20 @@ class CollapseProjectSuite extends PlanTest {
       comparePlans(optimized, expected)
     }
   }
+
+  test("SPARK-53399: Merge expressions") {
+    val query = testRelation
+      .select($"a" + 1 as "a_plus_1", $"b" + 1 as "b_plus_1")
+      .select($"a_plus_1" + $"a_plus_1", $"b_plus_1")
+      .analyze
+
+    val optimized = Optimize.execute(query)
+
+    val expected = testRelation
+      .select($"a" + 1 as "a_plus_1", $"b")
+      .select($"a_plus_1" + $"a_plus_1", $"b" + 1 as "b_plus_1")

Review Comment:
   Yeah, indeed this is tough.
   So shall we just force combining adjacent projects (when everything in them 
is deterministic) in a group of projects, if there is a parent project in the 
group with python UDFs?
   
   Let me come up with something...



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to