vinodkc opened a new pull request, #53334:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/53334

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the 
guideline first in
        'common/utils/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   This PR modifies the MS SQL Server JDBC dialect to map Spark's 
`TimestampType` and `TimestampNTZType` to SQL Server's DATETIME2 type instead 
of the legacy DATETIME type, preventing microsecond precision loss.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   **Bug** : Spark's microsecond-precision timestamps are silently truncated to 
milliseconds when writing to MS SQL Server, causing permanent data loss.
   
   **Root Cause**:
   Spark's `TimestampType` stores timestamps with microsecond precision (6 
decimal places)
   Current code maps timestamps to SQL Server's `DATETIME` type (3 decimal 
places - milliseconds only)
   The last 3 decimal places are truncated.
   
   eg:
   ```scala
   // Spark stores timestamps with microsecond precision
   val df = Seq(
     Timestamp.valueOf("2024-12-03 14:25:37.789123"),  // 789123 microseconds
     Timestamp.valueOf("2024-12-03 14:25:37.789456")   // 789456 microseconds
   ).toDF("timestamp")
   
   // Write to SQL Server with current code
   df.write.jdbc(url, "table", props)
   
   // Read back - microseconds are LOST
   val result = spark.read.jdbc(url, "table", props)
   // Both timestamps now show: 789000 microseconds
   // Lost: 123 and 456 microseconds (permanently!)
   // Events now appear simultaneous - ordering corrupted
   ```
   
   **Solution**:
   Use SQL Server's `DATETIME2` type which provides 7 decimal places 
(100-nanosecond precision):
   
   - Fully preserves Spark's 6-decimal microsecond precision
   - Available since SQL Server 2008 (16+ years old, 99%+ adoption)
   - Microsoft-recommended for all new development since 2008
   - Used by other ORMs (Entity Framework, Hibernate) as the default
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
new features, bug fixes, or other behavior changes. Documentation-only updates 
are not considered user-facing changes.
   
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   Yes. This PR changes the default SQL Server type mapping for timestamps.
   
   - New Behavior (Default):
   
       `TimestampType` → `DATETIME2` (7 decimal places)
      `TimestampNTZType` → `DATETIME2` (7 decimal places)
   
   - Full microsecond precision preserved
   
   **Configuration**:
   ```scala
   // Default: Use DATETIME2 (prevents data loss)
   spark.conf.set("spark.sql.mssqlserver.useDatetime2ForTimestamp.enabled", 
"true")
   
   // Legacy: Use DATETIME for SQL Server 2005 compatibility (if needed)
   spark.conf.set("spark.sql.mssqlserver.useDatetime2ForTimestamp.enabled", 
"false")
   ```
   **Why Default to true**:
   
   1. Prevents silent data corruption
   2. SQL Server 2008+ is nearly universal (released 2008)
   3. Aligns with Microsoft best practices
   4. Consistent with PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle behavior
   5. Other frameworks (Entity Framework, Hibernate) default to DATETIME2
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   If benchmark tests were added, please run the benchmarks in GitHub Actions 
for the consistent environment, and the instructions could accord to: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html#github-workflow-benchmarks.
   -->
   Integration tests add in `MsSqlServerIntegrationSuite`
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this 
patch, please include the
   phrase: 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version.
   If no, write 'No'.
   Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling 
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details.
   -->
   No.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to