ericm-db opened a new pull request, #54098:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/54098

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the 
guideline first in
        'common/utils/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   This PR introduces the SequentialUnion logical plan node, which enables 
sequential processing of multiple streaming sources. Unlike the existing Union 
operator that processes all children concurrently, SequentialUnion processes 
each child source to completion before moving to the next.
   
   Key changes:
   - Added SequentialUnion case class extending UnionBase in 
basicLogicalOperators.scala
   - Supports byName and allowMissingCol parameters for schema compatibility
   - Includes flatten() method to handle nested SequentialUnion nodes (enabling 
chaining)
   - Validates minimum 2 children and parameter constraints
   - Added comprehensive test suite in SequentialUnionSuite.scala
   
   This is the foundational logical plan component. Execution support and 
user-facing APIs will be added in follow-up PRs.
   
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   Sequential Union enables backfill-to-live streaming scenarios where 
historical data must be processed completely before transitioning to live data, 
while preserving stateful operator state across the transition.
   
   Example use case: Process historical Parquet data completely, then 
seamlessly switch to live Kafka streaming - all within a single query that 
maintains aggregations, watermarks, and deduplication state.
   This pattern is not currently possible with the existing Union operator, 
which processes all sources concurrently.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   No. This PR only adds the internal logical plan node. No user-facing APIs or 
behavior changes are introduced yet.
   
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   If benchmark tests were added, please run the benchmarks in GitHub Actions 
for the consistent environment, and the instructions could accord to: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html#github-workflow-benchmarks.
   -->
   Added new test suite SequentialUnionSuite with tests covering:
   - Basic node creation and validation
   - Minimum children requirement (at least 2)
   - Output schema verification
   - byName and allowMissingCol parameter constraints
   - Flattening logic for nested SequentialUnions (single level, deeply nested, 
multiple nested scenarios)
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this 
patch, please include the
   phrase: 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version.
   If no, write 'No'.
   Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling 
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details.
   -->
   No


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to