dongjoon-hyun opened a new pull request, #56177:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/56177
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the `Update build status workflow`
(`.github/workflows/update_build_status.yml`) so that it coerces non-standard
workflow run statuses (`requested`, `waiting`, `pending`) to a value accepted
by the `PATCH /repos/{owner}/{repo}/check-runs/{check_run_id}` endpoint.
The `else` branch now maps `run.data.status` to either `in_progress` (when
it is exactly `in_progress`) or `queued` (for any other non-`completed` value),
instead of passing the raw value through.
### Why are the changes needed?
The scheduled job has been failing intermittently with HTTP 422.
-
https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/workflows/update_build_status.yml?query=is%3Afailure
<img width="1184" height="1040" alt="Screenshot 2026-05-27 at 21 31 50"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9a8501d6-be43-4dc4-b6d2-7550ca3ff513";
/>
For example, run
[26552065653](https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/26552065653/job/78216028779)
failed with:
```
Run 78216352873: set status (pending)
RequestError [HttpError]: Invalid request.
No subschema in "anyOf" matched.
pending is not a member of ["queued", "in_progress", "completed"].
```
`GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/actions/runs/{run_id}` can return any of
`completed`, `in_progress`, `queued`, `requested`, `waiting`, or `pending`,
while `PATCH /check-runs/{id}` only accepts `queued`, `in_progress`, or
`completed`. Forwarding the raw value caused the workflow to crash whenever a
fork's run was in `pending` (or `requested`/`waiting`) state, and the
corresponding PR check-runs were not synchronized for that cycle.
### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No.
### How was this patch tested?
Manual review of the workflow script. The change is limited to mapping a
string value before passing it to the GitHub REST API; behavior for the
existing `completed` and `in_progress` paths is unchanged.
### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
Generated-by: Claude Opus 4.7
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
