gaogaotiantian opened a new pull request, #57093:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/57093

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the 
guideline first in
        'common/utils/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   1. Moved the dependency list from `requirements.txt` to `pyproject.toml` 
(`requirements.txt` file is not deleted in this PR for compatibility, it will 
eventually be removed).
   2. Update the docs, including `AGENTS.md`, to use `pyprojec.toml` instead of 
`dev/requirements.txt`.
   3. Fixed some leftover reference to `black` where we already use `ruff`.
   4. Added the explanation for both human and agents to use `pip>=25.1` which 
supports the dependency groups.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     5. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   This is just the first step of an important project - to put all of our 
python dependencies in a single place. To be more specific, dependencies for
   1. development (currently `requirements.txt`)
   2. CI (individually defined in docker files and workflow files)
   3. packaging (defined in `setup.py`)
   
   Every time we change a dependency, we need to change it all over our code 
base and we probably will miss some. What's even worse is that we had to pin 
dependencies for different release branches.
   
   With the effort to decouple CI, we basically solve the release branch 
dependency issue (except for 4.2 which has been in rc stage for a while - I 
want to wait for its release to decouple it). We don't need to keep 
dependencies for different release branches anymore.
   
   Now we want to move dependency pins from docker files and workflows to 
`pyproject.toml` - `requirements.txt` can't do it because the testing 
environment is complicated. They share some dependencies but also require 
different ones for each workflow. We need group structure to make it possible 
and that's where [dependency 
group](https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/dependency-groups/)
 comes in. It's a relatively new feature 
[PEP-735](https://peps.python.org/pep-0735/) which was supported by `pip` on 
April 2025 (more than a year ago). `uv sync` also supports it.
   
   I believe with this approach, we can eliminate all the dependencies in the 
docker file and workflow file. We should be able to have a single source of 
truth of the Python dependency. And it will be more structured.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
new features, bug fixes, or other behavior changes. Documentation-only updates 
are not considered user-facing changes.
   
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   No.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   If benchmark tests were added, please run the benchmarks in GitHub Actions 
for the consistent environment, and the instructions could accord to: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html#github-workflow-benchmarks.
   -->
   
   This PR should not affect CI.
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this 
patch, please include the
   phrase: 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version.
   If no, write 'No'.
   Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling 
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details.
   -->
   
   No.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to