jerrypeng opened a new pull request, #57212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/57212

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the 
guideline first in
        'common/utils/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue.
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   This combines **parts 6 and 7** of the multi-PR effort to add *streaming 
shuffle* to Spark — a push-based shuffle used by Real-Time Mode (RTM) 
structured streaming, where writer tasks push records directly to reader tasks 
over the network instead of writing map output to disk for readers to pull. 
Part 6 (activation) is small, so it is bundled with the end-to-end tests (part 
7) that exercise it.
   
   **Activation** — wire the streaming shuffle into the shuffle lifecycle via 
the `StreamingShuffleOutputTracker` (added in part 2):
   
   - **`DAGScheduler.createShuffleMapStage`** — when a shuffle map stage is 
created, also register the shuffle with the `StreamingShuffleOutputTracker` 
(alongside the existing `MapOutputTracker` registration). This is a no-op 
unless streaming shuffle is in use (`streamingShuffleOutputTracker` is only 
defined when the streaming shuffle manager is active).
   - **`BlockManagerStorageEndpoint`** (`RemoveShuffle`) — when a shuffle is 
removed, unregister it from the `StreamingShuffleOutputTracker`, freeing its 
`shuffleInfos` / `taskLocations` entries. The existing `MapOutputTracker` 
unregister is a no-op for streaming shuffles.
   
   Both hooks go through `SparkEnv.streamingShuffleOutputTracker`, which is 
`None` for the default sort shuffle, so the default path is unchanged.
   
   **End-to-end tests** — `StreamingShuffleSuite`, a real-Netty integration 
suite that drives the full writer <-> reader path now that the writer (part 4) 
and reader (part 5) are merged. It covers, among other things: writer <-> 
reader data transfer, the credit-control / termination handshake, 
sequence-number validation (out-of-order / duplicate / missing detection), 
checksum verification, memory back-pressure, background-thread error 
propagation via `ErrorNotifier`, resource cleanup on task completion (including 
that `RemoveShuffle` unregisters the shuffle from the tracker), and that a 
reader fails (rather than hangs) when a writer disconnects before terminating. 
A small test-only accessor, `TransportServer.channelFuture()`, is added so the 
suite can assert the writer's server-channel state.
   
   The full PR stack:
   
   - **Part 1** (SPARK-56674, *merged*) - streaming shuffle wire protocol (the 
four Netty message types).
   - **Part 2** (SPARK-56962, *merged*) - `StreamingShuffleOutputTracker` 
(driver-side writer-location coordination).
   - **Part 3** (SPARK-57141, *merged*) - shuffle-manager layer 
(`StreamingShuffleManager` + `MultiShuffleManager`).
   - **Part 3.5** (SPARK-57337, *merged*) - shared transport + error plumbing 
(`ErrorNotifier`, `TransportClient.send(ByteBuf)`, checksum config).
   - **Part 4** (SPARK-57229, *merged*) - `StreamingShuffleWriter` + 
server-side Netty handler (push path).
   - **Part 5** (SPARK-57230, *merged*) - `StreamingShuffleReader` + 
client-side Netty handler (pull path).
   - **Parts 6 & 7** (*this PR*) - activation (register/unregister with the 
tracker in the `DAGScheduler` / `BlockManager` lifecycle) + the end-to-end 
`StreamingShuffleSuite`.
   - **Part 8** - documentation.
   
   With parts 1 through 5 all merged, this PR is standalone against `master`.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   Real-Time Mode / low-latency continuous queries need shuffle data to flow 
continuously between stages, which streaming shuffle provides by pushing 
records directly from writer tasks to reader tasks. For a reader to discover 
its writers, each streaming shuffle must be registered with the 
`StreamingShuffleOutputTracker` when its stage is created, and unregistered 
when the shuffle is removed so its per-shuffle state does not leak. These two 
lifecycle hooks are the last code needed (together with the already-merged 
writer and reader) to run a streaming shuffle end to end, and 
`StreamingShuffleSuite` verifies that full path.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
new features, bug fixes, or other behavior changes. Documentation-only updates 
are not considered user-facing changes.
   
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   No. The streaming shuffle managers are opt-in via `spark.shuffle.manager` 
and are not the default. The activation hooks are guarded by 
`SparkEnv.streamingShuffleOutputTracker`, which is `None` for the default sort 
shuffle, so the default shuffle path is unaffected.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   If benchmark tests were added, please run the benchmarks in GitHub Actions 
for the consistent environment, and the instructions could accord to: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html#github-workflow-benchmarks.
   -->
   
   This PR adds `StreamingShuffleSuite`, an end-to-end integration suite (real 
Netty writer + reader) covering the full push/pull path, the credit-control / 
termination handshake, sequence-number and checksum validation, memory 
back-pressure, error propagation, resource cleanup, and the register/unregister 
lifecycle added here. Run with:
   
   ```
   build/sbt "core/testOnly 
org.apache.spark.shuffle.streaming.StreamingShuffleSuite"
   ```
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this 
patch, please include the
   phrase: 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version.
   If no, write 'No'.
   Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling 
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details.
   -->
   
   Co-authored with Claude Code (Claude Opus 4.8)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to