cloud-fan opened a new pull request, #57747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/57747

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., 
'[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a 
faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first 
for naming configurations in
        
'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the 
guideline first in
        'common/utils/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section 
is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster 
reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class 
hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other 
DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   Spark Connect's protocol includes an operation ID for identifying an 
`ExecutePlan` request, but
   clients currently leave it unset unless callers explicitly provide one. This 
PR makes operation
   IDs available throughout the request lifecycle:
   
   * Python and Scala clients generate an operation ID before sending every 
`ExecutePlan` request.
   * Python exposes it through `ExecutionInfo.operation_id` after successful 
execution and
     `SparkConnectException.operation_id` after failure.
   * Scala clients continue exposing it in `ExecutePlanResponse` and can 
retrieve it from failures
     through `SparkConnectClient.getOperationId`.
   * Python session hooks preserve the client-generated operation ID.
   * The server publishes the ID through 
`SparkContext.SPARK_CONNECT_OPERATION_ID_PROPERTY`.
   
   No protocol change is required, and callers that explicitly provide an 
operation ID retain the
   existing behavior.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   Successful requests can sometimes be correlated using the operation ID 
returned by the server.
   That is insufficient for failures before the first response, because the 
caller never learns a
   server-generated identifier.
   
   Generating the identifier client-side provides a stable correlation key 
before the RPC begins.
   The server propagates the same ID using Spark's existing local-property 
mechanism, making it
   available to driver-side listeners and executor tasks. Applications and 
observability integrations
   can therefore correlate client failures, server logs, Spark jobs, and tasks 
without depending on a
   specific event system.
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as 
new features, bug fixes, or other behavior changes. Documentation-only updates 
are not considered user-facing changes.
   
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes 
- provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the 
behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to 
the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   Yes. Spark Connect clients now generate operation IDs by default. Python 
users can access the ID
   through execution information and exceptions; Scala users can access it 
through responses and
   exceptions. Server-side integrations can access it through the public Spark 
local-property key.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some 
test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive 
cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify 
how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other 
reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why 
it was difficult to add.
   If benchmark tests were added, please run the benchmarks in GitHub Actions 
for the consistent environment, and the instructions could accord to: 
https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html#github-workflow-benchmarks.
   -->
   
   Added tests for generated operation IDs, Python session-hook preservation, 
successful execution
   metadata, exceptions, and server-side local-property propagation.
   
   Ran:
   
   * `build/sbt 'connect-client-jvm/testOnly 
org.apache.spark.sql.connect.client.SparkConnectClientSuite'`
   * `build/sbt 'connect/testOnly 
org.apache.spark.sql.connect.service.SparkConnectServiceE2ESuite'`
   
   The focused Python test command was also invoked, but the configured local 
interpreter skipped the
   Connect tests because pandas 2.2 or newer was unavailable.
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   <!--
   If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this 
patch, please include the
   phrase: 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version.
   If no, write 'No'.
   Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling 
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details.
   -->
   
   Generated-by: OpenAI Codex (GPT-5)
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to