laserninja opened a new pull request, #58791:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/58791

   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   
   Use data-type equality for leaf types after the existing recursive 
nullability handling. Add coverage for collations, character lengths, time 
precision, interval bounds, and nested containers.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   
   The ignoreNullable comparator accepts remaining types solely because 
typeName matches. This also ignores semantic parameters unrelated to 
nullability, such as UTF8_BINARY versus UTF8_LCASE collations.
   
   ```python
   from pyspark.sql.types import StringType, StructField, StructType
   from pyspark.testing import assertSchemaEqual
   a = StructType([StructField("s", StringType())])
   b = StructType([StructField("s", StringType("UTF8_LCASE"))])
   assertSchemaEqual(a, b)  # Returns without raising
   ```
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   
   Yes. With ignoreNullable=True, schemas with unequal leaf-type parameters now 
raise DIFFERENT_SCHEMA. Recursive array, map, and struct nullability remains 
ignored.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   The new regression tests failed before the fix and passed afterward on 
Python 3.10.11 with NumPy 2.2.6. The focused run passed 2 tests, including 
parameterized subtests:
   
   ```bash
   PYTHONPATH=python TERM=dumb python -m unittest 
pyspark.sql.tests.test_utils.SchemaComparisonTests -q
   PYTHON_EXECUTABLE=python ./dev/lint-python --compile --custom-pyspark-error 
--ruff
   ```
   
   Run the commands with the Python virtual environment activated; the local 
run shared an environment from a sibling checkout. The tests call public Python 
APIs directly and require no SparkSession. Python compilation, custom-error 
checks, Ruff lint, and Ruff formatting passed. JVM-backed suites were not run 
because these fixes are confined to Python-side logic.
   
   Draft pending creation and linking of the corresponding ASF Jira issue.
   
   ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
   
   Generated-by: OpenAI Codex (GPT-6).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to