marko-radoicic-db commented on PR #58777:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/58777#issuecomment-5834099437

   > Do we need `assert_column_resolution_error` here? In a Connect parity 
suite, an inherited test normally indicates identical Classic and Connect 
behavior, including the error condition/message. That is also the convention we 
have been using when analyzing parity tests. Overriding this helper lets the 
same test accept different errors, hiding an observable behavior difference. 
Could we inline the expected condition instead? If the divergence is 
intentional, the relevant Connect tests should be explicitly overridden and 
documented.
   
   Good point - here's a followup that does just that: 
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/59040


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to