cloud-fan commented on PR #58656:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/58656#issuecomment-6336192874
Thanks for the update. I re-reviewed 4168a32841b: correlated carried
descendants are now routed, but the second case from r4281444233 still returns
every row of t1, because an uncorrelated value-position IN carried by the
existence join on the sub-query plan is left for the join-condition rewrite,
which turns it into a two-valued exists; details are in the comment on
optimizer/subquery.scala.
<!-- SPARK_DEV_REVIEW_REPLY
{"feedback_id":"conversation:6332638268","thread_id":"conversation:6332638268","verdict_sha256":"3bb54f2a3a4b20553e9d3ca5caee9c4a8fc61921fc05f7c2363e10d0f4e5e7b0"}
-->
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]