Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7379#issuecomment-122177553 The <= case is quite easy to implement. This implementation is currently targetted at range joining a rather small (broadcastable) to an arbitrarily large table. I don't think this matches the use case of SMJ: i.e. equi joining arbitrarily large tables. But I might be missing something?
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org