Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7379#issuecomment-122177553
  
    The <= case is quite easy to implement.
    
    This implementation is currently targetted at range joining a rather small 
(broadcastable) to an arbitrarily large table. I don't think this matches the 
use case of SMJ: i.e. equi joining arbitrarily large tables. But I might be 
missing something?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to