Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8072#issuecomment-132213070
I think the name is ok, but it might be better if we have put application
in it: spark.yarn.application.tags. thoughts?
My thinking is that way if in the future some other config with tags in the
name of it comes along it won't be confusing. It matches the
setApplicationTags name too.
If both of you prefer the current name I'm ok with it though.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
