Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7461#discussion_r38597517
  
    --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
    @@ -1080,6 +1080,21 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
           var partiallyAggregated = mapPartitions(it => 
Iterator(aggregatePartition(it)))
           var numPartitions = partiallyAggregated.partitions.length
           val scale = math.max(math.ceil(math.pow(numPartitions, 1.0 / 
depth)).toInt, 2)
    +
    +      // Do one level of aggregation based on executorId before starting 
the tree
    +      // NOTE: exclude the driver from list of executors
    +      val numExecutors = math.max(context.getExecutorStorageStatus.length 
- 1, 1)
    +      partiallyAggregated = partiallyAggregated.mapPartitionsWithIndex { 
case (idx, iter) =>
    +        def isAllDigits(x: String) = x forall Character.isDigit
    +        val execId = SparkEnv.get.executorId
    +        if (isAllDigits(execId)) {
    +          iter.map((execId.toInt, _))
    +        } else {
    +          iter.map((execId.hashCode, _))
    --- End diff --
    
    Yeah we don't necessarily need ints but its easy to reason about how 
`hashCode` get balanced for ints (since the value of integer is the hashCode). 
If you leave it as a String we will still have the same issue I pointed out 
above with uneven tree structure


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to