Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8710#discussion_r39345043
  
    --- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
    @@ -348,10 +348,24 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging 
with ExecutorAllocationCli
     
       // Thread Local variable that can be used by users to pass information 
down the stack
       private val localProperties = new InheritableThreadLocal[Properties] {
    -    override protected def childValue(parent: Properties): Properties = 
new Properties(parent)
    +    override protected def childValue(parent: Properties): Properties = {
    +      // Note: make a clone such that changes in the parent properties 
aren't reflected in
    +      // the those of the children threads, which has confusing semantics 
(SPARK-10564).
    +      val p = new Properties
    +      val filtered = parent.asScala.filter { case (k, _) =>
    +        !nonInheritedLocalProperties.contains(k)
    +      }
    +      p.putAll(filtered.asJava)
    +      p
    +    }
         override protected def initialValue(): Properties = new Properties()
       }
     
    +  /**
    +   * Keys of local properties that should not be inherited by children 
threads.
    +   */
    +  private[spark] val nonInheritedLocalProperties: HashSet[String] = new 
HashSet[String]
    --- End diff --
    
    the whole point of SPARK-10548 is to avoid inheriting the SQL execution ID. 
How can we avoid that with just cloning?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to