Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8506#issuecomment-140459166
I'm wondering if there's much benefit from having sorting at all in this
table, regardless of multiple attempts or not. There are limited entries per
page (20 I think), which is not bad. Sorting is not maintained across pages;
and is not really aware that there are multiple pages. So it sorts only the
current list, not the complete list of applications. The behavior ends up being
a little weird.
Personally I wouldn't miss sorting in the current implementation. It might
be worth it to refactor this page so that it's more dynamic instead of relying
on the HTML code embedded in Scala, and then have better sorting, but that's a
much bigger effort.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
