Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9125#issuecomment-148233963
Oh, actually this PR depends on PR #9104, since #9104 makes partitioned
Parquet table scans produce `UnsafeRow`s while this one makes non-partitioned
Parquet table scans produce `UnsafeRow`s. That's the reason why the last
Jenkins build failed. Will trigger again once #9104 gets merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
