GitHub user felixcheung opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10171

    [SPARK-12168][SPARKR] Add automated tests for conflicted function in R

    Currently this is reported when loading the SparkR package in R (probably 
would add is.nan)
    ```
    Loading required package: methods
    
    Attaching package: ‘SparkR’
    
    The following objects are masked from ‘package:stats’:
    
        cov, filter, lag, na.omit, predict, sd, var
    
    The following objects are masked from ‘package:base’:
    
        colnames, colnames<-, intersect, rank, rbind, sample, subset,
        summary, table, transform
    ```
    
    Adding this test adds an automated way to track changes to masked method.
    Also, the second part of this test check for those functions that would not 
be accessible without namespace/package prefix.
    
    Incidentally, this might point to how we would fix those inaccessible 
functions in base or stats.
    Looking for feedback for adding this test.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/felixcheung/spark rmaskedtest

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10171.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #10171
    
----
commit 7c7c5d3c88870ba5297011751983d84d6e521f1b
Author: felixcheung <[email protected]>
Date:   2015-12-07T04:52:02Z

    add test

----


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to