Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6935#discussion_r47555787
--- Diff: docs/monitoring.md ---
@@ -69,36 +83,53 @@ follows:
</tr>
</table>
+### Spark configuration options
+
<table class="table">
<tr><th>Property Name</th><th>Default</th><th>Meaning</th></tr>
<tr>
<td>spark.history.provider</td>
- <td>org.apache.spark.deploy.history.FsHistoryProvider</td>
+ <td><code>org.apache.spark.deploy.history.FsHistoryProvider</code></td>
<td>Name of the class implementing the application history backend.
Currently there is only
one implementation, provided by Spark, which looks for application
logs stored in the
file system.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
+ <td>spark.history.retainedApplications</td>
+ <td>50</td>
--- End diff --
any particular reason to reorder this option? I'm biased to keeping the
old ordering just for git history
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
