Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10723#discussion_r50619696
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkQl.scala ---
@@ -42,6 +45,95 @@ private[sql] class SparkQl(conf: ParserConf =
SimpleParserConf()) extends Cataly
getClauses(Seq("TOK_QUERY", "FORMATTED", "EXTENDED"),
explainArgs)
ExplainCommand(nodeToPlan(query), extended = extended.isDefined)
+ case Token("TOK_REFRESHTABLE", nameParts :: Nil) =>
+ val tableIdent = extractTableIdent(nameParts)
+ RefreshTable(tableIdent)
+
+ case Token("TOK_CREATETABLEUSING", createTableArgs) =>
+ val Seq(
+ temp,
+ allowExisting,
+ Some(tabName),
+ tableCols,
+ Some(Token("TOK_TABLEPROVIDER", providerNameParts)),
+ tableOpts,
+ tableAs) = getClauses(Seq(
+ "TEMPORARY",
+ "TOK_IFNOTEXISTS",
+ "TOK_TABNAME", "TOK_TABCOLLIST",
+ "TOK_TABLEPROVIDER",
+ "TOK_TABLEOPTIONS",
+ "TOK_QUERY"), createTableArgs)
+
+ val tableIdent: TableIdentifier = tabName match {
+ case Token("TOK_TABNAME", Token(dbName, _) :: Token(tableName,
_) :: Nil) =>
--- End diff --
I am personally not big on using wildcards in pattern matches. This
prevents us from catching a grammar problem early. Since most of the wildcards
are actually empty lists, why not match these?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
