Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11868#issuecomment-199982128
  
    Oh, I see what is the point here now. @rxin , may I explain a little bit 
more?
    
    Mathematically, `NaN` equality is defined `false`. The followings are all 
**false** in Scala (and Java).
    * row_a(1).getDouble(0) == row_a(1).getDouble(0)
    * row_b(1).getFloat(0) == row_b(1).getFloat(0)
    * row_a(1).getDouble(0) == row_b(1).getFloat(0)
    * Double.NaN == Double.NaN
    * Float.NaN == Float.NaN
    * Double.NaN == Float.NaN
    
    However, Spark `Row` on master branch already returns **true** for the 
followings.
    * Row(Double.NaN) == Row(Double.NaN)
    * Row(Float.NaN) == Row(Float.NaN)
    
    As you guess easily, the followings are still **false**.
    * Row(Float.NaN).getFloat(0) == Row(Float.NaN).getFloat(0)
    * Row(Double.NaN).getDouble(0) == Row(Double.NaN).getDouble(0)



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to