Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12797#discussion_r61774969
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/ProcessingTimeExecutorSuite.scala
---
@@ -21,19 +21,41 @@ import java.util.concurrent.{CountDownLatch, TimeUnit}
import org.apache.spark.SparkFunSuite
import org.apache.spark.sql.ProcessingTime
-import org.apache.spark.util.ManualClock
+import org.apache.spark.util.{Clock, ManualClock, SystemClock}
class ProcessingTimeExecutorSuite extends SparkFunSuite {
test("nextBatchTime") {
val processingTimeExecutor =
ProcessingTimeExecutor(ProcessingTime(100))
+ assert(processingTimeExecutor.nextBatchTime(0) === 100)
assert(processingTimeExecutor.nextBatchTime(1) === 100)
assert(processingTimeExecutor.nextBatchTime(99) === 100)
- assert(processingTimeExecutor.nextBatchTime(100) === 100)
+ assert(processingTimeExecutor.nextBatchTime(100) === 200)
assert(processingTimeExecutor.nextBatchTime(101) === 200)
assert(processingTimeExecutor.nextBatchTime(150) === 200)
}
+ private def testNextBatchTimeAgainstClock(clock: Clock) {
+ val IntervalMS = 100
+ val processingTimeExecutor =
ProcessingTimeExecutor(ProcessingTime(IntervalMS), clock)
+
+ val ITERATION = 10
+ var nextBatchTime: Long = 0
+ for (it <- 1 to ITERATION)
+ nextBatchTime = processingTimeExecutor.nextBatchTime(nextBatchTime)
+
+ // nextBatchTime should be 1000
+ assert(nextBatchTime === IntervalMS * ITERATION)
--- End diff --
What is this checking that isn't checked by `test("nextBatchTime")` above?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
