Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13228#issuecomment-220759647
@jkbradley this is a missing param on the python side - I noticed it while
reviewing the PR for doc for count vectorizer, hashing tf and quantile
discretizer.
It also contains doc fixes as quantile discretizer doc is incorrect now
that it uses approx quantile.
I thought we were still trying to get as much of pyspark parity for 2.0 as
we can?
Otherwise I can just make the doc changes
On Sat, 21 May 2016 at 00:35, jkbradley <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
> Is this targeted at 2.0? I'd prefer we focus on finishing documentation &
> QA checks before working on new features and APIs.
>
> â
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13228#issuecomment-220734278>
>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
