Github user rdblue commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13769#discussion_r67749047
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/DataSourceStrategy.scala
 ---
    @@ -43,8 +43,128 @@ import org.apache.spark.unsafe.types.UTF8String
      * Replaces generic operations with specific variants that are designed to 
work with Spark
      * SQL Data Sources.
      */
    -private[sql] object DataSourceAnalysis extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
    +private[sql] case class DataSourceAnalysis(conf: CatalystConf) extends 
Rule[LogicalPlan] {
    +
    +  def resolver: Resolver = {
    +    if (conf.caseSensitiveAnalysis) {
    +      caseSensitiveResolution
    +    } else {
    +      caseInsensitiveResolution
    +    }
    +  }
    +
    +  // The access modifier is used to expose this method to tests.
    +  private[sql] def convertStaticPartitions(
    --- End diff --
    
    Why is this rule only applied to HadoopFsRelation? It would be fine to 
change Hive to write using this rule as well and we would need fewer 
relation-specific rules.
    
    This isn't a huge issue, but I'm concerned about the proliferation of fixes 
for either Hive or data sources that are never applied to the other. We should 
be consolidating the implementation wherever possible.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to