Github user koeninger commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11863#discussion_r68121385
  
    --- Diff: 
external/kafka-0-10/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/CachedKafkaConsumer.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.streaming.kafka
    +
    +import java.{ util => ju }
    +
    +import org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.{ ConsumerConfig, ConsumerRecord, 
KafkaConsumer }
    +import org.apache.kafka.common.TopicPartition
    +
    +import org.apache.spark.SparkConf
    +import org.apache.spark.internal.Logging
    +
    +
    +/**
    + * Consumer of single topicpartition, intended for cached reuse.
    + * Underlying consumer is not threadsafe, so neither is this,
    + * but processing the same topicpartition and group id in multiple threads 
is usually bad anyway.
    --- End diff --
    
    Using the same group id for any two jobs you expect to keep separate is 
already a disaster with either the old or new Kafka high level consumers.
    
    The underlying consumer does have a lightweight locking mechanism, and will 
just throw a ConcurrentModificationException if someone does do this.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to