GitHub user ericl opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427

    [SPARK-16818] Exchange reuse incorrectly reuses scans over different sets 
of partitions

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14425 rebased for branch-2.0

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/ericl/spark spark-16818-br-2

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #14427
    
----
commit ef60367331fb3097040cfb0849bdc314c8d399ea
Author: Eric Liang <e...@databricks.com>
Date:   2016-07-31T05:48:09Z

    [SPARK-16818] Exchange reuse incorrectly reuses scans over different sets 
of partitions
    
    This fixes a bug wherethe file scan operator does not take into account 
partition pruning in its implementation of `sameResult()`. As a result, 
executions may be incorrect on self-joins over the same base file relation.
    
    The patch here is minimal, but we should reconsider relying on `metadata` 
for implementing sameResult() in the future, as string representations may not 
be uniquely identifying.
    
    cc rxin
    
    Unit tests.
    
    Author: Eric Liang <e...@databricks.com>
    
    Closes #14425 from ericl/spark-16818.
    
    Conflicts:
        
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala

----


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to