Github user petermaxlee commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14676#discussion_r75248513
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/ResolveInlineTables.scala
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *    http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis
    +
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.InternalRow
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.{Cast, 
InterpretedProjection, Unevaluable}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.logical.{LocalRelation, 
LogicalPlan}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.rules.Rule
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.types.{StructField, StructType}
    +
    +/**
    + * An analyzer rule that replaces [[UnresolvedInlineTable]] with 
[[LocalRelation]].
    + */
    +object ResolveInlineTables extends Rule[LogicalPlan] {
    +  override def apply(plan: LogicalPlan): LogicalPlan = plan transformUp {
    +    case table: UnresolvedInlineTable if table.expressionsResolved =>
    +      validateInputDimension(table)
    +      validateInputEvaluable(table)
    +      convert(table)
    +  }
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Validates that all inline table data are foldable expressions.
    +   *
    +   * This is package visible for unit testing.
    +   */
    +  private[analysis] def validateInputEvaluable(table: 
UnresolvedInlineTable): Unit = {
    +    table.rows.foreach { row =>
    +      row.foreach { e =>
    +        if (!e.resolved || e.isInstanceOf[Unevaluable]) {
    +          e.failAnalysis(s"cannot evaluate expression ${e.sql} in inline 
table definition")
    +        }
    +      }
    +    }
    +  }
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Validates the input data dimension:
    +   * 1. All rows have the same cardinality.
    +   * 2. The number of column aliases defined is consistent with the number 
of columns in data.
    +   *
    +   * This is package visible for unit testing.
    +   */
    +  private[analysis] def validateInputDimension(table: 
UnresolvedInlineTable): Unit = {
    +    if (table.rows.nonEmpty) {
    +      val numCols = table.rows.head.size
    +      table.rows.zipWithIndex.foreach { case (row, ri) =>
    --- End diff --
    
    That's a good idea. Let me do that.



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to