Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14467#discussion_r75260662
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/python/PythonRDD.scala
---
@@ -889,21 +892,42 @@ private class PythonAccumulatorParam(@transient
private val serverHost: String,
socket
}
- override def zero(value: JList[Array[Byte]]): JList[Array[Byte]] = new
JArrayList
+ override def reset(): Unit = {
+ this._acc = Collections.synchronizedList(new JArrayList[Array[Byte]])
+ }
+
+ override def isZero: Boolean = {
+ this._acc.isEmpty
+ }
+
+ override def copyAndReset(): PythonAccumulatorV2 = new
PythonAccumulatorV2(serverHost, serverPort)
+
+ override def copy(): PythonAccumulatorV2 = {
+ val newAcc = new PythonAccumulatorV2(serverHost, serverPort)
+ newAcc._acc.addAll(this._acc)
+ newAcc
+ }
+
+ // This happens on the worker node, where we just want to remember all
the updates
+ override def add(val2: JList[Array[Byte]]): Unit = {
+ _acc.addAll(val2)
+ }
+
- override def addInPlace(val1: JList[Array[Byte]], val2:
JList[Array[Byte]])
- : JList[Array[Byte]] = synchronized {
+ override def merge(other: AccumulatorV2[JList[Array[Byte]],
JList[Array[Byte]]]): Unit = {
+ val otherPythonAccumulator = other.asInstanceOf[PythonAccumulatorV2]
+ // This conditional isn't strictly speaking needed - merging only
currently happens on the
+ // driver program - but that isn't gauranteed so incase this changes.
if (serverHost == null) {
- // This happens on the worker node, where we just want to remember
all the updates
- val1.addAll(val2)
- val1
+ // We are on the worker
+ add(otherPythonAccumulator._acc)
} else {
// This happens on the master, where we pass the updates to Python
through a socket
val socket = openSocket()
val in = socket.getInputStream
val out = new DataOutputStream(new
BufferedOutputStream(socket.getOutputStream, bufferSize))
- out.writeInt(val2.size)
- for (array <- val2.asScala) {
+ out.writeInt(otherPythonAccumulator._acc.size)
--- End diff --
This is looking good. There is one more possible thread-safety issue here.
Here we access the size of another (synchronized) list, then iterate over it.
Both could be a problem if the list is changed somewhere during this process. I
think we'd want to explicitly synchronize on `otherPythonAccumulator._acc` for
this whole block, because that's what `Collections.synchronizedList` is doing
in all other cases to guard access to it.
Either that or confirm that this would never be called in a multi-threaded
context.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
