Github user mpjlu commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14597#discussion_r75294150
  
    --- Diff: 
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
    @@ -189,11 +228,35 @@ class ChiSqSelector @Since("1.3.0") (
        */
       @Since("1.3.0")
       def fit(data: RDD[LabeledPoint]): ChiSqSelectorModel = {
    -    val indices = Statistics.chiSqTest(data)
    -      .zipWithIndex.sortBy { case (res, _) => -res.statistic }
    -      .take(numTopFeatures)
    -      .map { case (_, indices) => indices }
    -      .sorted
    +    chiSqTestResult = Statistics.chiSqTest(data)
    +    selectorType match {
    +      case ChiSqSelectorType.KBest => selectKBest(numTopFeatures)
    +      case ChiSqSelectorType.Percentile => selectPercentile(percentile)
    +      case ChiSqSelectorType.Fpr => selectFpr(alpha)
    +      case _ => throw new Exception("Unknown ChiSqSelector Type")
    +    }
    +  }
    +
    +  @Since("2.1.0")
    +  def selectKBest(value: Int): ChiSqSelectorModel = {
    --- End diff --
    
    The usage scenario here is:
    model = selector.fit(df)
    result = model.transform(features).
    I try to understand your proposal:
    Suppose the user generate the model1 use KBest:
    model1 = selector.fit(df). 
    you mean the user can config selector, like 
    selector.setPercentile(0.1)
    then, the model1 will be a different model, like it is generated by 
Percentile method, because it can use the parameters of selector.  Does my 
understanding right?



---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to