Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14931#discussion_r77745305
  
    --- Diff: 
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/StandaloneSchedulerBackend.scala
 ---
    @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ private[spark] class StandaloneSchedulerBackend(
       override def executorRemoved(fullId: String, message: String, 
exitStatus: Option[Int]) {
         val reason: ExecutorLossReason = exitStatus match {
           case Some(code) => ExecutorExited(code, exitCausedByApp = true, 
message)
    -      case None => SlaveLost(message)
    +      case None => SlaveLost(message, workerLost = true /* worker loss 
event from master */)
    --- End diff --
    
    This assumes that `exitStatus == None` implies that a worker was lost, but 
there are some corner-cases where this isn't necessarily true (e.g. if an 
executor kill fails). Looking through both the 1.6.x and 2.0.x code, it appears 
that `ExecutorStatus.LOST` is used exclusively for denoting whole-worker-loss, 
so I think that we should check that status here instead of assuming `true`. 
Other than that minor corner-case, this patch looks good to me, so I'll merge 
once we fix this.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to