Github user JustinPihony commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12601#discussion_r77948196
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcRelationProvider.scala
 ---
    @@ -17,39 +17,105 @@
     
     package org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.jdbc
     
    +import java.sql.SQLException
     import java.util.Properties
     
    -import org.apache.spark.sql.SQLContext
    -import org.apache.spark.sql.sources.{BaseRelation, DataSourceRegister, 
RelationProvider}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.{DataFrame, SaveMode, SQLContext}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.sources.{BaseRelation, 
CreatableRelationProvider, DataSourceRegister, RelationProvider}
    +import org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType
     
    -class JdbcRelationProvider extends RelationProvider with 
DataSourceRegister {
    +class JdbcRelationProvider extends CreatableRelationProvider
    +  with RelationProvider with DataSourceRegister {
     
       override def shortName(): String = "jdbc"
     
    -  /** Returns a new base relation with the given parameters. */
       override def createRelation(
           sqlContext: SQLContext,
           parameters: Map[String, String]): BaseRelation = {
         val jdbcOptions = new JDBCOptions(parameters)
    -    if (jdbcOptions.partitionColumn != null
    -      && (jdbcOptions.lowerBound == null
    -        || jdbcOptions.upperBound == null
    -        || jdbcOptions.numPartitions == null)) {
    -      sys.error("Partitioning incompletely specified")
    -    }
    +    val partitionColumn = jdbcOptions.partitionColumn
    +    val lowerBound = jdbcOptions.lowerBound
    +    val upperBound = jdbcOptions.upperBound
    +    val numPartitions = jdbcOptions.numPartitions
     
    -    val partitionInfo = if (jdbcOptions.partitionColumn == null) {
    -      null
    -    } else {
    +    val partitionInfo = if (partitionColumn == null) { null }
    --- End diff --
    
    Yes, but the guidelines do not specify this scenario. It is not returning a 
unit, but a value and looks ridiculous in comparison. I have made the change to 
fit your needs  and "_speed_" up, though.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to