Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15054#discussion_r78765976
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/AnalyzeTableCommand.scala
---
@@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ case class AnalyzeTableCommand(tableName: String, noscan:
Boolean = true) extend
case logicalRel: LogicalRelation if
logicalRel.catalogTable.isDefined =>
updateTableStats(logicalRel.catalogTable.get,
logicalRel.relation.sizeInBytes)
+ case o if !o.isInstanceOf[LeafNode] =>
--- End diff --
I think a better fix is: when do `loopupRelation`, we always pass in a
table identifier with database, so that it won't search the temp views.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
