Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#discussion_r88525329
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/generators.scala
 ---
    @@ -149,29 +167,52 @@ case class Stack(children: Seq[Expression])
           InternalRow(fields: _*)
         }
       }
    +
    +  override protected def doGenCode(ctx: CodegenContext, ev: ExprCode): 
ExprCode = {
    +    // Rows - we write these into an array.
    +    val rowData = ctx.freshName("rows")
    +    ctx.addMutableState("InternalRow[]", rowData, s"this.$rowData = new 
InternalRow[$numRows];")
    +    val values = children.tail
    +    val dataTypes = values.take(numFields).map(_.dataType)
    +    val code = ctx.splitExpressions(ctx.INPUT_ROW, Seq.tabulate(numRows) { 
row =>
    --- End diff --
    
    Unfortunately, splitExpressions does not work with whole stage codegen, we 
have to fallback if there are many rows.
    
    Can you add a test for that (many rows)?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org

Reply via email to