Github user michalsenkyr commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16157 Sorry for the delay. You are probably right that the partitioning is primarily determined by data locality and that it is therefore appropriate in some cases and shouldn't be worded such as to imply it isn't usually appropriate. I will think about how to word it more appropriately and remove the implementation specifics.
--- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org