Github user zero323 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16533#discussion_r95667260
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/decorators.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+# this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+# The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+# (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+# the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+#
+
+from pyspark.sql.types import StringType
+from pyspark.sql.functions import udf as _udf
+
+
+def udf(returnType=StringType()):
--- End diff --
OK, I moved decorator to `sql.functions` as `udf_decorator`. _Explicit is
better than implicit_, right? Nevertheless I am reluctant to further attempts
to merge it with the main `udf` function.
Technically It is possible, but it will require all kinds of special cases.
It would be manageable for now, when we only support `returnType`, but if we
ever decide to add further arguments (like `name`) it would be a mess.
Especially when project is committed to supporting legacy Python versions.
Otherwise we could just use `keyword` only arguments:
def udf(func=None, *, returnType=StringType()):
...
We could mimic that to some extent, without using backwards compatibility,
by using keyword arguments:
def udf(func=None, **kwargs):
returnType = kwargs.get("returnType", StringType())
...
but I don't think it is worth loosing explicit argument list.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]