Github user mridulm commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16576#discussion_r96131096
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1539,6 +1539,9 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
// NOTE: we use a global lock here due to complexities downstream with
ensuring
// children RDD partitions point to the correct parent partitions. In
the future
// we should revisit this consideration.
+ if (doCheckpointCalled) {
+ logWarning(s"Because job has been executed on RDD ${id}, checkpoint
won't work")
--- End diff --
We have to decide if we simply log a message and ignore it (if it is a
design choice) or if we need to fix this.
From git, @mateiz and @zsxwing were the last people to work on it this -
would be great to hear from them : this might be a variant of SPARK-6847 which
@zsxwing fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
