Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16666#discussion_r97260863
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_clustering.R ---
@@ -225,10 +225,12 @@ setMethod("spark.kmeans", signature(data =
"SparkDataFrame", formula = "formula"
#' @param object a fitted k-means model.
#' @return \code{summary} returns summary information of the fitted model,
which is a list.
-#' The list includes the model's \code{k} (number of cluster
centers),
+#' The list includes the model's \code{k} (the configured number
of cluster centers),
#' \code{coefficients} (model cluster centers),
-#' \code{size} (number of data points in each cluster), and
\code{cluster}
-#' (cluster centers of the transformed data).
+#' \code{size} (number of data points in each cluster),
\code{cluster}
+#' (cluster centers of the transformed data), and
\code{clusterSize}
+#' (the actual number of cluster centers. When using initMode =
"random",
--- End diff --
OK. I will add it. For bisecting kmeans, I haven't found a case like this.
This case only occurs when initMode is random and this behavior was due to one
fix to kmeans implementation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
