Github user ioana-delaney commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15363#discussion_r105044802
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/patterns.scala
---
@@ -257,3 +258,28 @@ object PhysicalAggregation {
case _ => None
}
}
+
+/**
+ * A pattern that matches a base table access and collects the
+ * the corresponding leaf node and the applied predicates.
+ * A base table access represents a LeafNode, or a Project or Filter
operators
+ * above a LeafNode.
+ */
+object BaseTableAccess extends PredicateHelper {
+ def unapply(plan: LogicalPlan): Option[(LogicalPlan, Seq[Expression])] =
plan match {
--- End diff --
@hvanhovell I missed ```PhysicalOperation``` pattern. They look the same. I
will take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
