Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2232#issuecomment-55985896
Hmm. My feeling is that it's better to be consistent here and consider the
old behavior a bug than to maintain compatibility than to support a cornerish
case for a property that's rarely used. Just wanted to bring it up. @pwendell
do you have an opinion on this?
Either way, for each of these properties, we should document whether they
can take HDFS paths and the default behavior when no scheme is given. Also,
are there any strange corner cases we can run into if a file exists at the same
path on the local FS and HDFS?
Last, do we need to also resolve URIs for spark.yarn.jar?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
