Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2401#issuecomment-56119651
@brndnmtthws Yes it would be good to keep the approach used in #1391 in
mind. It would be ideal if we could use an approach as similar as what we
currently (or plan to) do for yarn as possible, including the naming and the
semantics of the configs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
