Github user hhbyyh commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17645#discussion_r113836900
  
    --- Diff: 
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LinearSVC.scala ---
    @@ -42,15 +44,35 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.functions.{col, lit}
     /** Params for linear SVM Classifier. */
     private[classification] trait LinearSVCParams extends ClassifierParams 
with HasRegParam
       with HasMaxIter with HasFitIntercept with HasTol with HasStandardization 
with HasWeightCol
    -  with HasThreshold with HasAggregationDepth
    +  with HasThreshold with HasAggregationDepth {
    +
    +  /**
    +   * Specifies the loss function. Currently "hinge" and "squared_hinge" 
are supported.
    +   * "hinge" is the standard SVM loss (a.k.a. L1 loss) while 
"squared_hinge" is the square of
    +   * the hinge loss (a.k.a. L2 loss).
    +   *
    +   * @see <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinge_loss";>Hinge loss 
(Wikipedia)</a>
    +   *
    +   * @group param
    +   */
    +  @Since("2.3.0")
    +  final val lossFunction: Param[String] = new Param(this, "lossFunction", 
"Specifies the loss " +
    --- End diff --
    
    Sure we can do it. 
    But I'm thinking maybe we should conduct an integrated refactor about the 
common optimization parameters some time in the future, either through shared 
params or other trait or abstract class.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to