Github user michalsenkyr commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16986#discussion_r117363594
  
    --- Diff: 
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala 
---
    @@ -329,35 +329,19 @@ object ScalaReflection extends ScalaReflection {
             }
             UnresolvedMapObjects(mapFunction, getPath, Some(cls))
     
    -      case t if t <:< localTypeOf[Map[_, _]] =>
    +      case t if t <:< localTypeOf[Map[_, _]] || t <:< 
localTypeOf[java.util.Map[_, _]] =>
    --- End diff --
    
    Alright. Should I remove the case condition modifications in this PR or 
leave them as they are and remove them in the next one?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to